.....9:06pm - hey stupid, attend a BDDC meeting or better yet, enroll in a Sylvan Learning course so that you'll be able to read and you'll be able to learn that the BDDC does have a very active, contributing woman member in Jennifer Janelle.
please tell me how to make a programming language…i decided to use other programming languages to make mine (im deciding betwen pascal and basic) it’s probably the easiest way since i’ve seen other people do it…
Welcome to the IoT Security Lab 101
In this whitepaper on IoT Security, we touch on detailed analysis of design patterns implimented in the IoT Security Paradigm.
1. File Security
2. Communications Safety Measures
3. Software Scrunity
4. Device Integrity
5. Authorisation (Eg. The Waiter Attack)
We have a reversed engineered example of user interaction - being - they store data. Lots of data. Not only data - but their LIVES, on IoT devices. This is why a data breach on such an account might have suicidal impacts - hence the desperate demand for super level security on such devices. Not only for C-Class Employees, or even www.1.com NEO level security, but for the poor black child in Africa too.
1. DESIGN PATTERN #1 : CONTAINER
THE CONTAINER OBJECT MUST HAVE INNATE SECURITY. SUCH AS A SELF-EXTRACTING ZIP, THIS DATA CONTAINER REQUIRES A SOFTWARE CONSTRUCTED ENVRIONMENT TO SELF-EXTRACT IN A SECURE FASHION - OFTEN USING USER INTERACTION AS THE AUTHENTICATION MECHANISM.
2. DESIGN PATTERN #2 : SELECTION
BUILDING YOUR OWN SECURITY DEFENCES BY SELECTING FROM AN UNISEQ INDEXXED LIST OF TOP USER CHOICES FOR POSSIBLE SECURITY CONFIGURATIONS FOR YOUR DEVICE FROM, PARANODE, TO WILD WEST.
SECURITY BY CHOICE. JUST AS METASPLOIT HAS A MYRIAD OF EXPLOITS ON CHOICE , THE SECURITY TEAM ARE REQ. TO BUILD SECURITY SELECTION BOXES INTO EXISTING IOT DEVICES.
3. DESIGN PATTERN #3 : NODE
WHAT IS A NODE? A TOP LEVEL DOMAIN TERM OF A SECURITY CONCEPT. A NODE HAS A CONTAINER FOR THE USER, AUTHENICATIONS, AND INTERFACES. IT IS NOT THE GUI, BUT A LAYER TRANSPOSED FROM THE GUI. IN EVERY SYSTEM THE APPLICATION GIVES AWAY A VARIETY OF TOPICAL INFORMATION. ESPECIALLY IN WINDOWS TEN, THE INTERNALS ARE GETTING BIGGER THAN THE USER LEVEL.
THEREFORE, AN APPLICATION MUST BE DESIGNED FROM BOTTOM UP TO USE SECURITY IN OBSCURITY. FOR INSTANCE, HAVING AN ENCRYPTED USER LAND FROM THE SYSTEM BOOT STRAP IS ESSENTIAL.
IN CONCLUSION, NODES THAT HAVE CONTAINERS MUST SPEAK IN FORKED TONGUES FOR APACHE INDIAN RULE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS. Name: security 0000-00-00